Added capability for .remote() to contact the DHT (BEP46)

[lmatteis]

Discussion here webtorrent/webtorrent#886 (comment)

[lmatteis]

@yciabaud fixed the travis issue, but now the test-browser fails, which btw also fails locally. Seems a credentials problem with saucelabs.

[lmatteis]

poke @feross

[feross]

Sorry traveling in China for another week with sparse Internet. Will check
this out when I get back.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 8:35 PM Luca Matteis [email protected]
wrote:

poke @feross https://github.com/feross

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.

Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#38 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAHbpvPug9VZsD-49LySYk_ddpsT6MVVks5qlCOFgaJpZM4JpTzB
.

[HostFat]

Any news on this?

[jabyrd3]

Just want to sub to this so I can get an update whenever @feross is around.

[lmatteis]

@feross any news on this? The test errors are because of saucelabs credentials. It's missing the salt so I'll work on that as soon as I can.

[matthewaveryusa]

@feross @lmatteis is this just a matter of adding the following snippit at the beginning of test.js

var runSauceLabs = !process.env.CI ||
  (process.env.SAUCE_USERNAME && process.env.SAUCE_ACCESS_KEY)

if(!runSauceLabs) { process.exit(0); }

I think it's related to this: defunctzombie/zuul#86

I also noticed that the travis link is broken. It points to feross/... but the actual location is webtorrent/...

[matthewaveryusa]

Well, a bit more than that. Basically copying what is done in webtorrent/package.json to short-circuit the sauce issue for PRs. I can submit a separate PR to do this if that's what's needed to unblock this PR.

[matthewaveryusa]

submitted #46 for what I mentioned above. Should be all squared away

[RangerMauve]

Have the CI issues been fixed since this was created? Would a new PR that adds this functionality be welcome?

[RangerMauve]

@DiegoRBaquero Was this closed because it's been implemented? Or is it just very out of date?

[DiegoRBaquero]

Closed in favor of #58

[RangerMauve]

Thank you for clarifying!