Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Generate per-segment responses for any static page #73945

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: canary
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

acdlite
Copy link
Contributor

@acdlite acdlite commented Dec 15, 2024

Originally I gated per-segment prefetch generation on the PPR flag, because I thought the client Segment Cache would require PPR to be enabled on the server. However, since then the strategy has evolved and I do think we can roll out the Segment Cache independently of PPR.

Dynamic pages without PPR won't be able to take full advantage of the Segment Cache, but if the page is fully static then there's no reason we can't implement all the same behavior.

So during per-segment prerendering, I've changed the feature condition to check for the clientSegmentCache flag instead of the PPR one.


Additionally, when I broadened the feature check, a failing test revealed that I neglected to set up error digest decoding correctly, so the first commit in this stack fixes that.

@ijjk ijjk added created-by: Next.js team PRs by the Next.js team. type: next labels Dec 15, 2024
@acdlite acdlite force-pushed the segment-cache-support-for-any-static-page branch from f61f5ab to 7211398 Compare December 15, 2024 16:59
@acdlite acdlite requested review from ztanner and gnoff December 15, 2024 17:00
@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented Dec 15, 2024

Tests Passed

@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented Dec 15, 2024

Stats from current PR

Default Build (Increase detected ⚠️)
General
vercel/next.js canary acdlite/next.js segment-cache-support-for-any-static-page Change
buildDuration 19s 18.8s N/A
buildDurationCached 14.9s 12.6s N/A
nodeModulesSize 410 MB 410 MB N/A
nextStartRea..uration (ms) 450ms 467ms N/A
Client Bundles (main, webpack)
vercel/next.js canary acdlite/next.js segment-cache-support-for-any-static-page Change
1187-HASH.js gzip 50.9 kB 50.8 kB N/A
8276.HASH.js gzip 169 B 168 B N/A
8377-HASH.js gzip 5.36 kB 5.36 kB N/A
bccd1874-HASH.js gzip 53 kB 53 kB N/A
framework-HASH.js gzip 57.5 kB 57.5 kB N/A
main-app-HASH.js gzip 232 B 235 B N/A
main-HASH.js gzip 34.1 kB 34 kB N/A
webpack-HASH.js gzip 1.71 kB 1.71 kB N/A
Overall change 0 B 0 B
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary acdlite/next.js segment-cache-support-for-any-static-page Change
polyfills-HASH.js gzip 39.4 kB 39.4 kB
Overall change 39.4 kB 39.4 kB
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary acdlite/next.js segment-cache-support-for-any-static-page Change
_app-HASH.js gzip 193 B 193 B
_error-HASH.js gzip 193 B 193 B
amp-HASH.js gzip 512 B 510 B N/A
css-HASH.js gzip 343 B 342 B N/A
dynamic-HASH.js gzip 1.84 kB 1.84 kB
edge-ssr-HASH.js gzip 265 B 265 B
head-HASH.js gzip 363 B 362 B N/A
hooks-HASH.js gzip 393 B 392 B N/A
image-HASH.js gzip 4.49 kB 4.49 kB N/A
index-HASH.js gzip 268 B 268 B
link-HASH.js gzip 2.35 kB 2.34 kB N/A
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip 328 B 328 B
script-HASH.js gzip 397 B 397 B
withRouter-HASH.js gzip 323 B 326 B N/A
1afbb74e6ecf..834.css gzip 106 B 106 B
Overall change 3.59 kB 3.59 kB
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary acdlite/next.js segment-cache-support-for-any-static-page Change
_buildManifest.js gzip 749 B 746 B N/A
Overall change 0 B 0 B
Rendered Page Sizes
vercel/next.js canary acdlite/next.js segment-cache-support-for-any-static-page Change
index.html gzip 521 B 523 B N/A
link.html gzip 536 B 537 B N/A
withRouter.html gzip 517 B 521 B N/A
Overall change 0 B 0 B
Edge SSR bundle Size Overall increase ⚠️
vercel/next.js canary acdlite/next.js segment-cache-support-for-any-static-page Change
edge-ssr.js gzip 128 kB 128 kB N/A
page.js gzip 204 kB 204 kB ⚠️ +104 B
Overall change 204 kB 204 kB ⚠️ +104 B
Middleware size
vercel/next.js canary acdlite/next.js segment-cache-support-for-any-static-page Change
middleware-b..fest.js gzip 671 B 667 B N/A
middleware-r..fest.js gzip 155 B 156 B N/A
middleware.js gzip 31.2 kB 31.2 kB N/A
edge-runtime..pack.js gzip 844 B 844 B
Overall change 844 B 844 B
Next Runtimes
vercel/next.js canary acdlite/next.js segment-cache-support-for-any-static-page Change
523-experime...dev.js gzip 322 B 322 B
523.runtime.dev.js gzip 314 B 314 B
app-page-exp...dev.js gzip 323 kB 323 kB N/A
app-page-exp..prod.js gzip 127 kB 127 kB N/A
app-page-tur..prod.js gzip 140 kB 140 kB N/A
app-page-tur..prod.js gzip 135 kB 135 kB N/A
app-page.run...dev.js gzip 313 kB 313 kB N/A
app-page.run..prod.js gzip 123 kB 123 kB N/A
app-route-ex...dev.js gzip 37.4 kB 37.3 kB N/A
app-route-ex..prod.js gzip 25.5 kB 25.3 kB N/A
app-route-tu..prod.js gzip 25.5 kB 25.4 kB N/A
app-route-tu..prod.js gzip 25.3 kB 25.2 kB N/A
app-route.ru...dev.js gzip 39 kB 38.9 kB N/A
app-route.ru..prod.js gzip 25.3 kB 25.2 kB N/A
pages-api-tu..prod.js gzip 9.69 kB 9.67 kB N/A
pages-api.ru...dev.js gzip 11.6 kB 11.6 kB N/A
pages-api.ru..prod.js gzip 9.68 kB 9.67 kB N/A
pages-turbo...prod.js gzip 21.7 kB 21.7 kB N/A
pages.runtim...dev.js gzip 27.4 kB 27.4 kB N/A
pages.runtim..prod.js gzip 21.7 kB 21.7 kB N/A
server.runti..prod.js gzip 916 kB 916 kB N/A
Overall change 636 B 636 B
build cache Overall increase ⚠️
vercel/next.js canary acdlite/next.js segment-cache-support-for-any-static-page Change
0.pack gzip 2.05 MB 2.08 MB ⚠️ +29.1 kB
index.pack gzip 70.8 kB 74 kB ⚠️ +3.23 kB
Overall change 2.12 MB 2.15 MB ⚠️ +32.3 kB
Diff details
Diff for middleware.js

Diff too large to display

Diff for edge-ssr.js

Diff too large to display

Diff for 1187-HASH.js

Diff too large to display

Diff for main-HASH.js

Diff too large to display

Diff for app-page-exp..ntime.dev.js
failed to diff
Diff for app-page-exp..time.prod.js

Diff too large to display

Diff for app-page-tur..time.prod.js

Diff too large to display

Diff for app-page-tur..time.prod.js

Diff too large to display

Diff for app-page.runtime.dev.js
failed to diff
Diff for app-page.runtime.prod.js

Diff too large to display

Diff for app-route-ex..ntime.dev.js

Diff too large to display

Diff for app-route-ex..time.prod.js

Diff too large to display

Diff for app-route-tu..time.prod.js

Diff too large to display

Diff for app-route-tu..time.prod.js

Diff too large to display

Diff for app-route.runtime.dev.js

Diff too large to display

Diff for app-route.ru..time.prod.js

Diff too large to display

Diff for pages-api-tu..time.prod.js

Diff too large to display

Diff for pages-api.runtime.dev.js

Diff too large to display

Diff for pages-api.ru..time.prod.js

Diff too large to display

Diff for pages-turbo...time.prod.js

Diff too large to display

Diff for pages.runtime.dev.js

Diff too large to display

Diff for pages.runtime.prod.js

Diff too large to display

Diff for server.runtime.prod.js

Diff too large to display

Commit: a96d7df

@acdlite acdlite force-pushed the segment-cache-support-for-any-static-page branch from 7211398 to 42ee6a9 Compare December 15, 2024 17:18
@ijjk ijjk added the tests label Dec 15, 2024
@acdlite acdlite marked this pull request as draft December 15, 2024 18:22
This was an oversight on my part when I originally implemented the per-
segment prefetches. `onError` needs to return an error digest.
Originally I gated per-segment prefetch generation on the PPR flag,
because I thought the client Segment Cache would require PPR to be
enabled on the server. However, since then the strategy has evolved and
I do think we can roll out the Segment Cache independently of PPR.

Dynamic pages without PPR won't be able to take full advantage of the
Segment Cache, but if the page is fully static then there's no reason
we can't implement all the same behavior.

So during per-segment prerendering, I've changed the feature condition
to check for the `clientSegmentCache` flag instead of the PPR one.
@acdlite acdlite force-pushed the segment-cache-support-for-any-static-page branch from 42ee6a9 to a96d7df Compare December 15, 2024 19:13
@acdlite acdlite marked this pull request as ready for review December 16, 2024 04:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants