Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add
interop.flow.pipeToProcessor
&interop.flow.processorToPipe
#3449base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add
interop.flow.pipeToProcessor
&interop.flow.processorToPipe
#3449Changes from all commits
9e09694
4d0ebe0
8e0a9df
d570b53
1fefbbd
62009ba
db3d152
ddd6516
4d1690f
d59c5b8
86bef28
df42a15
2371f1c
771e658
f4b825d
8406c16
a67b91f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We don't have access to the upstream
Publisher
yet, so we can't do thesubscribe
here. So we do nothing and wait for it.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not entirely sure I understand the waiting part. Can/should we use a
Deferred
here?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No sorry, my point is that
subscribe
should be something likeIO(publisher.subscribe(streamSubscriber))
as you can see in the implementation ofsyntax.fromPublisher
.Here, however, we don't have a
Publisher
yet, so we don't control when we are published.Basically, this is very similar to the
fromPublisher
overload that accepts aSubscriber => F[Unit]
, just that rather than receiving the lambda, we are just returning a rawProcessor / Subscriber
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, I understand now.
I think what confused me was that this is the first time we are effectively exposing
StreamSubscriber
. Our existing{to,from}Publisher
APIs have kept it hidden.So I do feel weird about exposing it now. But I guess nothing here is unreasonable 🤔