-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create a glossary of common terms #69
Comments
Agreed terminology
|
FWIW, here's a post on the coordinate system we adopt in SLEAP (center pixel-aligned): This is the same as OpenCV too. |
Thanks @talmo, this is super useful! |
also include/link to the concept of movement dataset |
and the concept of bounding boxes (and tracked bounding boxes) |
|
As pointed out by @lochhh we should also clarify any
|
From the meeting with Mikkel:
|
The problem
Throughout the code and the docs we refer to specialist terms such as "poses", "pose tracks", "pose estimation", "tracking".
We either resort to explaining these terms at multiple places, or we assume the the user/reader know what they mean.
Solution
As proposed by @lochhh, we could have a glossary of terms in the docs, defining these terms unambiguously. We could then reference the glossary when we need to.
We could even add a schematic to each term, which will greatly aid their understanding. We can reuse the schematics in talks etc.
Resources
This paper defines some of these terms well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: