Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support bem-xjst 8.x #2010

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 19, 2017
Merged

Support bem-xjst 8.x #2010

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 19, 2017

Conversation

tadatuta
Copy link
Member

@tadatuta tadatuta commented Mar 7, 2017

Closes #1942

Cherry-pick of #1996 by @miripiruni


Showcase is available

@tadatuta tadatuta added the ready label Mar 7, 2017
@miripiruni
Copy link
Contributor

👍

Ready to merge?

@@ -62,16 +62,19 @@ module.exports = {
'applyCtx',
'applyNext',
'attrs',
'addAttrs',
'bem',
'block',
'cls',
'content',
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

appendContent?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

…and prependContent

'local',
'match',
'mix',
'addMix',
'mod',
'mode',
'tag',
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Guess we should drop once and extend probably.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

extend continue exists

@@ -46,10 +46,12 @@ block('menu')(
attrs['aria-disabled'] = 'true' :
attrs.tabindex = 0;

return attrs;
// extend in backwards order:
// bemjson have more priority
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

bemjson haS

@tadatuta tadatuta merged commit 53623ae into v6 Mar 19, 2017
@tadatuta tadatuta deleted the issues/1942@v6 branch March 19, 2017 13:05
@tadatuta tadatuta removed the ready label Mar 19, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants