Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Quick fix for slurm artifacts #222

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 11, 2024
Merged

Quick fix for slurm artifacts #222

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 11, 2024

Conversation

sfmig
Copy link
Collaborator

@sfmig sfmig commented Jul 11, 2024

A quick and somewhat hacky fix for #221 .

We probably need to improve how the SLURM logs are added as artifacts.
We may want to do it in the bash script instead? I opened an issue

@sfmig sfmig requested a review from nikk-nikaznan July 11, 2024 15:58
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 46.13%. Comparing base (99ed754) to head (dcdf97c).

Files Patch % Lines
crabs/detector/evaluate_model.py 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #222      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   46.16%   46.13%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          24       24              
  Lines        1460     1461       +1     
==========================================
  Hits          674      674              
- Misses        786      787       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@nikk-nikaznan nikk-nikaznan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

make sense to me

@sfmig sfmig merged commit 8fc0ed8 into main Jul 11, 2024
6 checks passed
@sfmig sfmig deleted the smg/fix-slurm-interactive branch July 11, 2024 16:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants