Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Set mlflow experiment and run name for evaluation #219

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

sfmig
Copy link
Collaborator

@sfmig sfmig commented Jul 8, 2024

  • If not passed as cli argument: experiment_name is defined from the training job's name + '_evaluation'
  • If not specified via CLI: the run name is set to be _

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 8, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 9.09091% with 30 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 39.13%. Comparing base (ff59d84) to head (00e0dc6).

Files Patch % Lines
crabs/detector/utils/evaluate.py 11.53% 23 Missing ⚠️
crabs/detector/evaluate_model.py 0.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
crabs/detector/datamodules.py 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #219      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   39.52%   39.13%   -0.39%     
==========================================
  Files          24       24              
  Lines        1417     1431      +14     
==========================================
  Hits          560      560              
- Misses        857      871      +14     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@sfmig
Copy link
Collaborator Author

sfmig commented Oct 29, 2024

Closing because combined with #220

@sfmig sfmig closed this Oct 29, 2024
@sfmig sfmig deleted the smg/eval-mlflow-names branch November 1, 2024 15:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants