Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The old matsim-uam-4.1.3-jar-with-dependencies.jar has some compiling… #93

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

haowuintub
Copy link
Collaborator

… issues? Somehow does not work. I uploaded here the correct one :)

When I use the old jar, here is the message:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: net/bhl/matsim/uam/scenario/RunCreateUAMBeelineScenario
at org.eqasim.sao_paulo.scenario.CreateUAMScenario.main(CreateUAMScenario.java:9)
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: net.bhl.matsim.uam.scenario.RunCreateUAMBeelineScenario
at java.base/jdk.internal.loader.BuiltinClassLoader.loadClass(BuiltinClassLoader.java:606)
at java.base/jdk.internal.loader.ClassLoaders$AppClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoaders.java:168)
at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:522)
... 1 more

Process finished with exit code 1

… issues? Somehow does not work. I uploaded here the correct one :)
@haowuintub haowuintub requested a review from RRothfeld April 17, 2024 20:46
@RRothfeld
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey Hao, thank you for noticing! Before merging however, I would like to ask: in your commit I can only see the updated .jar-File but no changes in code. Have any changes been necessary in the code as well or did you simply repackage using the existing code?

@balacmi
Copy link
Collaborator

balacmi commented Apr 18, 2024

This seems like something one does not want to do: provide a jar file within the project itself. We do have a repository where releases can be stored on packagecloud. Why is that one not used?

@haowuintub
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hey Hao, thank you for noticing! Before merging however, I would like to ask: in your commit I can only see the updated .jar-File but no changes in code. Have any changes been necessary in the code as well or did you simply repackage using the existing code?

Dear Raoul, Good morning. I simply repackage using the existing code of branch "routingBug" :)

@haowuintub
Copy link
Collaborator Author

haowuintub commented Apr 18, 2024

This seems like something one does not want to do: provide a jar file within the project itself. We do have a repository where releases can be stored on packagecloud. Why is that one not used?

Dear Milos,
Thanks for asking. It seems like we do not have a automatic pipeline on GitHub for generating the jar file like matsim-lib (When a verified version made, a jar will be generated automatically as P&R version, e.g., 16.0-PR3172). Currently, we do not have jar file with version 4.1.3. on ivt URL where the jars are stored: https://packagecloud.io/eth-ivt/uam

@RRothfeld
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey Milos, hey Hao! I can't remember the state of the routing bug branch, but the master branch (which is ahead) should be used, shouldn't it? But I am also happy with Milos' idea that no jar files are stored within the code but only externally.

@balacmi
Copy link
Collaborator

balacmi commented Apr 18, 2024

I can make a new release, 4.1.3, and store it properly. I suggest removing the provided jar file from the project. This would mean that someone who wants to work with the develop version would need to make the jar themselves. Would that be ok?

@RRothfeld
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes, thank's alot, Milos!

@balacmi
Copy link
Collaborator

balacmi commented Apr 18, 2024

I have created a new release. Please reopen this if something does not work with the released jar.

@balacmi balacmi closed this Apr 18, 2024
@haowuintub haowuintub deleted the routingBug_Hao branch April 18, 2024 13:16
@haowuintub
Copy link
Collaborator Author

haowuintub commented Apr 18, 2024

Hey Milos, hey Hao! I can't remember the state of the routing bug branch, but the master branch (which is ahead) should be used, shouldn't it? But I am also happy with Milos' idea that no jar files are stored within the code but only externally.

Dear Raoul: actually, we should not include the code changes after 4.1.3 has been released, isn't it?

Dear Milos: Thanks a lot, that makes more sense. I have test it and it works now :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants