Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add support for device cxw-ble006 #1303

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

nesror
Copy link
Contributor

@nesror nesror commented Mar 16, 2024

No description provided.

AlexxIT added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2024
@AlexxIT
Copy link
Owner

AlexxIT commented Mar 24, 2024

Thanks! I have rewrited converter into new format. Not sure if rotate works fine.

@AlexxIT AlexxIT closed this Mar 24, 2024
@AlexxIT AlexxIT added this to the v4.0.0 milestone Mar 24, 2024
@AlexxIT
Copy link
Owner

AlexxIT commented Mar 24, 2024

For your info AlexxIT/Blog#20

@AlexxIT
Copy link
Owner

AlexxIT commented Mar 31, 2024

@relliky
Copy link

relliky commented May 8, 2024

@AlexxIT this commit 208ca11 does not provide variable knob rotation events previously provided by 32c5f2e

I'd like to push a PR to fix it for the new converter format because I have the device in my hand. The only thing I'd like to know is a way to obtain the property value once I press the button or twist the knob. e.g. I can see the previous converter has these values mapped

            -11: "knob_reduced_1", -12: "knob_reduced_2", -13: "knob_reduced_3",
            -14: "knob_reduced_4", -15: "knob_reduced_5", -16: "knob_reduced_6",
            -17: "knob_reduced_7", -18: "knob_reduced_8", 

I am not sure how @nesror obtain these values as they are not present in the MIOT spec https://miot-spec.org/miot-spec-v2/instance?type=urn:miot-spec-v2:device:remote-control:0000A021:cxw-ble006:1

@relliky
Copy link

relliky commented May 8, 2024

Never mind. I found the fix and will push a PR.

@relliky
Copy link

relliky commented May 8, 2024

Raised PR #1352

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants