You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was looking at the travis yml file and noticed that this added conda_deps and pip_deps to the script iteself. That is quite cool as a one liner instead of a script.
Is there an easy way to handle multiple conda channels in such dependencies?
I had heard that at some point conda install would default to pip install for packages not found in conda. I am guessing that has not yet happened in the conda releases yet?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 3:03 PM, rbiswas4 ***@***.***> wrote:
I was looking at the travis yml file and noticed that this added
conda_deps and pip_deps to the script iteself. That is quite cool as a one
liner instead of a script.
I am not sure I understand: should we change anything about the way this is
currently done? Are you suggesting the installation of dependencies should
be in the `script` block (below)?
- Is there an easy way to handle multiple conda channels in such
dependencies?
I think so. Notice that this currently adds conda-forge as a channel. I
believe that you can have different lines with:
conda install -c channel1 dependency1
conda install -c channel2 dependency2
- I had heard that at some point conda install would default to pip
install for packages not found in conda. I am guessing that has not yet
happened in the conda releases yet?
Sorry - I don't know anything about that. Do you have a link to any
I was looking at the travis yml file and noticed that this added conda_deps and pip_deps to the script iteself. That is quite cool as a one liner instead of a script.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: