Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Objectness loss, class loss and bounding box losses in YOLOv5 #13418

Open
1 task done
Shanky71 opened this issue Nov 18, 2024 · 2 comments
Open
1 task done

Objectness loss, class loss and bounding box losses in YOLOv5 #13418

Shanky71 opened this issue Nov 18, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
detect Object Detection issues, PR's question Further information is requested

Comments

@Shanky71
Copy link

Search before asking

Question

Hey @glenn-jocher I hope you are doing well. I have a small doubt about the objectness loss.

  • I have divided my data in 80% training, 15% testing and 5% validation. As shown in the below image, what can be the possible reason of the sudden spike in the initial part and also, why there is higher objectness loss during validation than training.

image

  • Also out of the three losses (class, objectness, box) which loss is more important. If I consider only class loss doesn't it also account for objectness and box loss?

@pderrenger @UltralyticsAssistant Can you please clarify it?

Additional

No response

@Shanky71 Shanky71 added the question Further information is requested label Nov 18, 2024
@UltralyticsAssistant UltralyticsAssistant added the detect Object Detection issues, PR's label Nov 18, 2024
@UltralyticsAssistant
Copy link
Member

👋 Hello @Shanky71, thank you for reaching out with your question about YOLOv5 🚀! This is an automated response to help guide you, and an Ultralytics engineer will also assist soon.

For questions related to loss functions and their behavior during training and validation, providing a bit more context can be extremely helpful. If you have logs, specific configurations, or additional screenshots from your training, please share them to aid in diagnosing the issue.

If this is a 🐛 Bug Report, please ensure you provide a minimum reproducible example so we can help you debug it accurately.

If you have questions about training specific to your dataset, please include as much information as possible, such as examples of your dataset images and any error logs.

Here are a few things to check:

  • Have you ensured that your dataset and labels are formatted correctly?
  • Are you following the tips for the best training results? Sometimes tweaks in hyperparameters or batch sizes can affect loss curves significantly.
  • Is your validation dataset distinct and representative of your training data?

Remember, the importance of each type of loss can depend on your specific use case. Generally, all three losses—class, objectness, and box—play crucial roles in effective model training.

Feel free to provide more details, and we'll do our best to assist you further! 😊

@pderrenger
Copy link
Member

@Shanky71 the initial spike in objectness loss during validation could be due to the model adjusting to the dataset's characteristics early in training. It’s common to see higher losses in validation compared to training if there’s overfitting or variance in the validation set. Regarding importance, all three losses (class, objectness, box) are crucial as they each contribute to different aspects of learning: classifying objects, predicting their presence, and accurately locating them. Focusing solely on class loss would neglect the spatial precision and presence confidence provided by the other losses. For further insights, you may refer to the YOLOv5 Loss Function documentation for a detailed explanation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
detect Object Detection issues, PR's question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants