[PRE REVIEW]: Vector: JIT-compilable mathematical manipulations of ragged Lorentz vectors

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @Saransh-cpp (Saransh Chopra)
Repository: https://github.com/scikit-hep/vector
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper
Version: v1.5.2
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1baf6a622a82d5ae3769726baa95fc0c"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1baf6a622a82d5ae3769726baa95fc0c/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1baf6a622a82d5ae3769726baa95fc0c/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1baf6a622a82d5ae3769726baa95fc0c)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @Saransh-cpp. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@Saransh-cpp if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7733568 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.4341376 is OK
- 10.7717/peerj-cs.103 is OK
- 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2023.116103 is OK
- 10.1051/epjconf/202429506016 is OK
- 10.1007/s41781-020-0035-2 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7504167 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.1217031 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.3895860 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Numba: A llvm-based python jit compiler
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Particle Transformer for Jet Tagging
- No DOI given, and none found for title: spyral-utils
- No DOI given, and none found for title: weaver-core

❌ MISSING DOIs

- 10.25080/majora-7b98e3ed-013 may be a valid DOI for title: Dask: Parallel computation with blocked algorithms...

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.36 s (1002.8 files/s, 179937.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                         236           9423           4644          39300
SVG                              2              1              1           3496
Markdown                         6            420              0           1339
Jupyter Notebook                 1              0           3669            415
YAML                            12             54             25            380
reStructuredText                99            149            640            273
TOML                             1              8              0            250
TeX                              1             14              0            189
JSON                             1              0              0             32
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           361          10081           8987          45709
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   146	pre-commit-ci[bot]
    80	Henry Schreiner
    74	Saransh Chopra
    46	dependabot[bot]
    37	Jim Pivarski
    29	Saransh
     4	eduardo-rodrigues
     3	Matthew Feickert
     3	Naman Priyadarshi
     2	Eduardo Rodrigues
     2	Florian Bruggisser
     1	Angus Hollands
     1	Benjamin Fischer
     1	Frantic Rabbit
     1	Luke Kreczko
     1	Michael Eliachevitch
     1	N!no
     1	Peter Fackeldey
     1	Raymond Ehlers
     1	Sinclert Pérez
     1	The Gitter Badger
     1	Yogendra Sharma
     1	p-mishra1

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 602

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

BoxKit: A Python library to manage analysis of block-structured simulation datasets
Submitting author: @akashdhruv
Handling editor: @kellyrowland (Active)
Reviewers: @rvg296, @Abinashbunty
Similarity score: 0.7384

Vlasiator.jl: A Julia package for processing Vlasiator data
Submitting author: @henry2004y
Handling editor: @pdebuyl (Active)
Reviewers: @ranocha, @tkoskela
Similarity score: 0.7320

PyArmadillo: a streamlined linear algebra library for Python
Submitting author: @jason-rumengan
Handling editor: @mjsottile (Retired)
Reviewers: @JaroslavHron, @uellue
Similarity score: 0.7254

Your: Your Unified Reader
Submitting author: @KshitijAggarwal
Handling editor: @dfm (Active)
Reviewers: @pravirkr, @paulray
Similarity score: 0.7165

Pyrokinetics - A Python library to standardise gyrokinetic analysis
Submitting author: @bpatel2107
Handling editor: @kellyrowland (Active)
Reviewers: @the-rccg, @rogeriojorge
Similarity score: 0.7144

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[kyleniemeyer]

Hi @Saransh-cpp, unfortunately I need to place this on our waitlist while I find an editor to handle it. Our go-to HEP editor @matthewfeickert has a COI here, unfortunately.

[matthewfeickert]

Our go-to HEP editor @matthewfeickert has a COI here, unfortunately.

To any would-be-editors considering this submission, my (highly biased) view is that it will be a super easy review to direct. :D

[kyleniemeyer]

@editorialbot invite @adonath as editor

Hi @adonath, I think this is up your alley - could you edit it?

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!