[REVIEW]: AdOpT-NET0: A technology-focused Python package for the optimization of multi-energy systems

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @JeanWi (Jan F. Wiegner)
Repository: https://github.com/UU-ER/AdOpT-NET0
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss-submission
Version: v0.1.2
Editor: @AdamRJensen
Reviewers: @trevorb1, @datejada
Archive: Pending

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/12578885161d419241e50c5e745b7a11"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/12578885161d419241e50c5e745b7a11/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/12578885161d419241e50c5e745b7a11/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/12578885161d419241e50c5e745b7a11)

Reviewers and authors:

Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)

Reviewer instructions & questions

@trevorb1 & @datejada, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review.
First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:

@editorialbot generate my checklist

The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @AdamRJensen know.

✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨

Checklists

@trevorb1, please create your checklist typing: @editorialbot generate my checklist

@datejada, please create your checklist typing: @editorialbot generate my checklist

[editorialbot]

Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.07.142 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c00681 is OK
- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.01.089 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107816 is OK
- 10.46855/energy-proceedings-5280 is OK
- 10.1038/s41597-019-0199-y is OK
- 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2021.10.002 is OK
- 10.1021/ACS.IECR.3C02226 is OK
- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120738 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Energy system integration options for the North Se...

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.16 s (1335.3 files/s, 194235.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          55           3411           3658          12216
JSON                            90              2              0           4937
SVG                              2             64              0           1642
CSV                             13              0              0           1103
reStructuredText                30            393            310            793
Jupyter Notebook                 3              0            855            245
YAML                             9             38             20            178
Markdown                         2             26              0            139
TeX                              1             10              0            100
TOML                             1              7              0             53
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           208           3963           4851          21441
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   331	6574114
   156	Jean
   141	Tiggeloven
    92	julia1071
    64	Jan Wiegner
    25	Luca
    24	Wiegner
    15	IngeOssentjuk
     7	6145795
     7	lucabert01
     2	Bertoni

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 895

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[AdamRJensen]

Hi @trevorb1, @datejada

Getting started on a review may seem daunting, but even spending just 20 minutes will allow you to check off a few of the first check boxes of the review.

Don't hesitate to reach out if you have question on how to get started.