Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Clarify R_TIMESTAMP_OFFSET behavior #64

Open
bruno-f-cruz opened this issue Dec 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Clarify R_TIMESTAMP_OFFSET behavior #64

bruno-f-cruz opened this issue Dec 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@bruno-f-cruz
Copy link
Member

When evaluating #23, several questions regarding register R_TIMESTAMP_OFFSET (15) came up.
@filcarv would you mind clarifying:

  1. How is this register implemented? The value is a U8, but the increments are 500us according to the spec.
  2. Can this register be used to update values with a negative offset?
  3. How many boards currently implement this feature?

We may want to quickly discuss this during a future SRM, but fo rnow it would be great to have some background information.
@bruno-f-cruz bruno-f-cruz added proposal Request for a new feature documentation Improvements or additions to documentation and removed proposal Request for a new feature labels Dec 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@bruno-f-cruz