Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

more aggressive styles? #45

Open
iambumblehead opened this issue Oct 4, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

more aggressive styles? #45

iambumblehead opened this issue Oct 4, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@iambumblehead
Copy link

iambumblehead commented Oct 4, 2018

Hello and thank you for this project,

I found many pages resistant to the styles here, including common ones served from google and reddit. A few days ago I added more aggressive selectors to the darcula stylesheet and they vastly improved the effectiveness of the styles.

For example, these styles are at the top of the darcula css file I am using (reddit pages look outstanding with these),

html {
  background-color: #262626 !important;
}
html body,
html div,
html div * {
  background-color: #262626 !important;
  color: #909396 !important;
  text-shadow:none !important;
}
html body div * {
  border-color: #909396 !important;
  text-shadow:none !important;
}
html body div a {
  text-shadow:none !important;
  color: #ce4139 !important;
}
html body div a:visited {
  color: #b68800 !important;
}
html body input,
html body textarea {
  background-color: #2e2e2e !important;
  color: #909396 !important;
}

I recommend using 'stronger' names in the stylesheets here.

@jgkamat
Copy link
Collaborator

jgkamat commented Oct 4, 2018

I actually already spent some time on this. It works almost everywhere, but it kills the native colors of websites almost completely, so there's a tradeoff: https://github.com/jgkamat/darculized-everything-css/blob/jay/aggressive/css/darculized/darculized-aggressive.css

This also works on Facebook: #39

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants