-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Viewing rendered docs from a PR to check #363
Labels
enhancement
New feature or request
Comments
Merged
https://readthedocs.org has pretty good support for pull request previews: https://docs.readthedocs.io/en/stable/pull-requests.html |
Or https://github.com/marketplace/actions/deploy-pr-preview might be useful, since I don't think readthedocs can (easily) build jekyll sites like this one. |
This was referenced Jun 1, 2024
dstansby
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 1, 2024
This reverts commit PR #376 (commit 2e196ec) which broke [the pages action](https://github.com/UCL-ARC/python-tooling/actions/runs/9329000737/job/25680916032). Side note, we should probably rerun the pages action (but without deployment) as a CI check if anything in the docs folder is changed. (A step along the way to #363.)
samcunliffe
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 4, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
For what is worth, we do that in the excalibur benchmarking repository: https://github.com/ukri-excalibur/excalibur-tests/blob/ede38fa104eed72557233cbfc76b230727973791/.github/workflows/docs.yml (this is using mkdocs rather than jekyll, but to give an idea of what one can do to accomplish that).
Originally posted by @giordano in #358 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: