You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I like the slider option, but an alternative to avoid issues with steps may be to just show the user the total number of frames and let them pick one from 0 to the max number of frames. Maybe something like showing [ ] / 2500, where [ ] is an editable input text box, and by default [ ] is populated with the midpoint of the video. Then we can have buttons for +1, -1, +10, -10 in case that frame is not convenient to quickly switch but stay in the vicinity.
I think something like that would be definitely possible. The only downside is that extracting new arbitrary frames takes time (~2-4 sec). But perhaps users would realise that and avoid needlessly browsing through frames. In other words, the frame viewer is to be used for ROI definition, not as a video viewer.
That said, I like the idea of an input field and the +10 / -10 buttons.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
From @sfmig:
I think something like that would be definitely possible. The only downside is that extracting new arbitrary frames takes time (~2-4 sec). But perhaps users would realise that and avoid needlessly browsing through frames. In other words, the frame viewer is to be used for ROI definition, not as a video viewer.
That said, I like the idea of an input field and the +10 / -10 buttons.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: