You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was drawing precise lines for a perspective work and noticed that unlike the Rectangle Tool, and Line Tools in other graphics software, the Line Tool doesn't show a live preview of the current dimensions (width, height) in the top-bar area, where it only shows end point coordinates and angle.
It would be helpful to show the line dimensions too.
The most simple convention is: only positive numbers independently of line direction, start at (1,1) for a single pixel.
You can also try other conventions like negative numbers when going top-left, however this may mess up with the convention of starting at (1, 1) (because then people expect relative numbers, so starting at (0, 0) and (-1, -1) when going 1px toward top-left).
Alternative conventions are good for me as long as they are precisely indicated with icons or labels (I often mess up between rectangle size and rectangle top-left to bottom-right offset, which differs by (1, 1) px in different graphics software, but it's OK as long as it's consistent with the rest - in this case, Rectangle Tool is already using always positive (1, 1) convention so it's good to keep for lines.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
I was drawing precise lines for a perspective work and noticed that unlike the Rectangle Tool, and Line Tools in other graphics software, the Line Tool doesn't show a live preview of the current dimensions (width, height) in the top-bar area, where it only shows end point coordinates and angle.
It would be helpful to show the line dimensions too.
The most simple convention is: only positive numbers independently of line direction, start at (1,1) for a single pixel.
You can also try other conventions like negative numbers when going top-left, however this may mess up with the convention of starting at (1, 1) (because then people expect relative numbers, so starting at (0, 0) and (-1, -1) when going 1px toward top-left).
Alternative conventions are good for me as long as they are precisely indicated with icons or labels (I often mess up between rectangle size and rectangle top-left to bottom-right offset, which differs by (1, 1) px in different graphics software, but it's OK as long as it's consistent with the rest - in this case, Rectangle Tool is already using always positive (1, 1) convention so it's good to keep for lines.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions