You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Originally posted by ryankinderman January 11, 2021
I've been working on some functionality that uses the JSON schema to help validate OpenAPI schemas, and recently noticed that the 3.0 schema allows any value for {name} in /components/{component}/{name}, while the specification states that "All the fixed fields declared above are objects that MUST use keys that match the regular expression: ^[a-zA-Z0-9\.\-_]+$." It seems like this could have been validated automatically by simply adding additionalProperties: false to the JSON schema.
My question is: Was not including additionalProperties: false in the JSON schema for 3.0 just an accidental omission, or was there some rationale behind not doing it?
Thanks for clarifying!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Discussed in #2439
Originally posted by ryankinderman January 11, 2021
I've been working on some functionality that uses the JSON schema to help validate OpenAPI schemas, and recently noticed that the 3.0 schema allows any value for
{name}
in/components/{component}/{name}
, while the specification states that "All the fixed fields declared above are objects that MUST use keys that match the regular expression:^[a-zA-Z0-9\.\-_]+$.
" It seems like this could have been validated automatically by simply addingadditionalProperties: false
to the JSON schema.My question is: Was not including
additionalProperties: false
in the JSON schema for 3.0 just an accidental omission, or was there some rationale behind not doing it?Thanks for clarifying!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: