Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unique Aspect on the wrong class/weapon #13

Open
Raskelot opened this issue Apr 10, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Unique Aspect on the wrong class/weapon #13

Raskelot opened this issue Apr 10, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@Raskelot
Copy link

Hi, it's me again, I just want to say, I use your website daily and I must be your biggest user haha.

As a Rogue, I noticed that I see the offensive aspect The Grandfather, but when I check on other build website like this one: https://d4planner.io/skilltree/Barbarian/EO:185

That weapon is actually a two-handed sword, which rogues can't equip. So I guess my question is, is there a way to have the weapon type in the tooltip of the aspect so we don't base a build around a specific aspect that the class can't use?

Also, is there any plan to improve the overall visual of the page? I personally set chrome zoom at 50% and on the website I put the zoom level to 2.0 (max). Adding some visual artwork or the tooltip. I love the change on paragon board, we can now rotate and place them, you're the best, thank you for that!

I managed to finish planning my build with your tool, here it is :D !

https://lothrik.github.io/diablo4-build-calc/#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-SFXThLLHIrH3LHbL6DhzTuRMBcOTnMM8sz8s-8s4Cs5CORXbLCs9iOXXSYcs1TyCym7ym5g+a3u5Zu3AReRLIO4FKh2PbDL0yEp0PZ7Z5SjIWgeIcUbC0Cu12BsSjd2gqWgOWvuQc0Ig+WhI2u+Je0JecCKr1Kr1Pz4v-WvEMqz2gf+eNSvQDVTXNBALAYC9TQMAoOgKC4CgzAoJtbdzQPNDMFde8sNTQ4wBwQEwD4QjNzwsBCLYPCcEhNEaNXA5mBo2waPhPCkTwlE8OrPDcQYnBsSIgStwYnc8OJPDKR4qk0WkuBpOPBjTx3Pk0RFHc1MwNTbDUsUxKlMBbClXlTh4C44GgMy4DM7NDl5MzqFs-DbOgH4uH+Hh3OgdzSIOczATgLhbMwfzbH8kJ-MsCLIQHWFR1ixtfPJWzImxOB3FS9wqTgO4sr8XK+TgI0CvSAqdgKu4RTgPxKqNSr3CMu4jL8IzNSMo0GqnbL5Sq7q-B-BD+s1DUEO1J4AAUIAhSacAAKUmkB7EmvhJCeAAtJbKCeabZnmgA3Sa7gAXyAA

@Lothrik
Copy link
Owner

Lothrik commented Apr 11, 2023

I added item slot indicators to all of the uniques, and did some basic filtering to prevent obviously-impossible uniques from showing up (like 2H swords on a Rogue).

image

Edit:

Also, is there any plan to improve the overall visual of the page? I personally set chrome zoom at 50% and on the website I put the zoom level to 2.0 (max). Adding some visual artwork or the tooltip.

Do you have a specific request, or are you just asking for me to add textures? I do plan to (eventually, as an optional feature) add something along those lines, but it's not super high priority (as I have at least eight remaining features to add, still). I'm not sure what the benefit is to 50% zoom in chrome when you can already zoom the canvas from 0.15x to 2x; I increased the UI zoom level maximum to 4.0 (from 2.0), though.

@Raskelot
Copy link
Author

Raskelot commented Apr 11, 2023

With 50% zoom and scale 2:
image

With 100% zoom and scale 1.0:
image

The tooltip just take 20% of the screen, no matter how far I scroll up or down.

And for texture, well anything other than black square and circle haha.

@Lothrik
Copy link
Owner

Lothrik commented Apr 12, 2023

I added a zoom option so you can adjust the size of tooltips without needing to scale the entire page; it uses the same "magnifying glass" button as the UI scale:
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants