You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@alanedelman suggested that the first formula in this paper (Hamel, 2001) could be applied to define a "Pfaffian" of an arbitrary square matrix, whether skew-symmetric or not:
Not clear if it has any useful properties for non-skew-symmetric matrices, or whether there is even a good way to compute it in general, but could be an interesting research problem to investigate.
(Note that this formula gives zero for a symmetric matrix. Also, it doesn't depend on the diagonal of the matrix at all, so if it has any useful properties they may only be for hollow matrices with zero diagonals.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@alanedelman suggested that the first formula in this paper (Hamel, 2001) could be applied to define a "Pfaffian" of an arbitrary square matrix, whether skew-symmetric or not:
Not clear if it has any useful properties for non-skew-symmetric matrices, or whether there is even a good way to compute it in general, but could be an interesting research problem to investigate.
(Note that this formula gives zero for a symmetric matrix. Also, it doesn't depend on the diagonal of the matrix at all, so if it has any useful properties they may only be for hollow matrices with zero diagonals.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: