Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Literature #2

Open
tmadon opened this issue Oct 1, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

Literature #2

tmadon opened this issue Oct 1, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@tmadon
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tmadon commented Oct 5, 2015

Here are a couple of guidelines for systematic review of academic studies in the social sciences. Most of them focus on heath outcomes, although they can be applied to studies of economic outcomes.

(1) PRISMA-P is the most comprehensive guideline for systematic review of intervention studies. It includes both review protocols and reporting checklists. A detailed guideline (with explanations of each step in the review protocol) is here:
http://www.bmj.com/content/349/bmj.g7647.long

You probably don't want to read the whole article, but I'd skim the abstract, intro & TOC.

(2) The Cochrane Collaboration has produced a handbook with detailed guidelines for systematic reviews: http://handbook.cochrane.org/

(3) A more detailed description of how to define/limit search terms in a systematic review is here:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691712000664

@tmadon tmadon mentioned this issue Oct 5, 2015
@tmadon
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tmadon commented Oct 5, 2015

@renai33
Copy link
Collaborator

renai33 commented Oct 31, 2015

For Econlit, we can use search terms like
"conditional cash transfer* AND (impact OR evaluation).
To find seminal work, we would probably need to include papers from 1997 to present.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants